Skoda Kylaq vs Mahindra 3XO – Which is Better?

Skoda Kylaq vs Mahindra 3XO has generated noteworthy buzz in the compact SUV segment in 2025.

In this article, we focus on the fully loaded Kylaq Prestige AT and 3XO AX7 L Turbo AT — the top trims that showcase everything each brand can offer.

Both sit under the 4‑meter mark for tax benefits, but they aim to deliver a premium experience that rivals larger SUVs. Let’s see which one is truly worth your money.

Skoda Kylaq vs Mahindra 3XO: Price Comparison

• The Kylaq Prestige AT comes in at about ₹16.09 lakh on-road in Delhi.
• The Mahindra 3XO AX7 L Turbo AT is priced around ₹18.34 lakh.

That’s a gap of over ₹2 lakh. Mahindra justifies its quote with a more powerful engine and advanced driver assistance features, while Skoda leans on European refinement and a slightly lower cost of ownership.

Skoda Kylaq vs Mahindra 3XO: Size and Space

The Mahindra is wider (1821 mm vs 1783 mm), though. It’s also taller (1647 mm vs 1619 mm). Meaning, you get a more spacious cabin.

That said, Skoda counters with a class-leading 446-liter boot. This easily outpaces 3XO’s 364 liters. For several kinds of travelers, this is a major practical advantage.

Mahindra 3XO vs Skoda Kylaq: Spec Comparison Table

• Mahindra has extra torque at lower revs, making it more responsive in city traffic.
• Kylaq has smaller turbo-petrol which is also smoother at highway speeds. It feels more refined, though it can’t match 3XO’s punch.

Skoda Kylaq vs Mahindra 3XO: Features Comparison

Skoda Kylaq Prestige AT:

• Ventilated front seats for hot-weather comfort
• Electric sunroof for an airy cabin feel
• 10.08-inch touchscreen with wireless Android Auto/Apple CarPlay
• Wireless phone charging pad
• Rain-sensing wipers and auto headlamps
• Auto-dimming IRVM for night driving ease
• Premium cabin finish with clean, minimalistic design cues

Mahindra XUV 3XO AX7 L Turbo AT:

• Dual-zone automatic climate control
• Electric sunroof
• 360-degree camera for all-round parking ease
• Large infotainment display with connected car tech
• Premium audio system
• Tech-forward cockpit with layered dashboard design
• Ventilated seats not standard here, but focus is on tech integration

Skoda Kylaq vs Mahindra 3XO: Safety Comparison

Skoda Kylaq Prestige AT:

• 6 airbags (front, side, curtain)
• Electronic Stability Control (ESC)
• Tyre Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS)
• Hill Hold Control
• ISOFIX child seat mounts
• Solid passive safety focus, no ADAS suite

Mahindra XUV 3XO AX7 L Turbo AT:

• 6 airbags
• Level-2 ADAS (adaptive cruise, lane keep assist, forward collision warning, autonomous emergency braking)
• 360-degree camera with blind-view monitoring
• Electronic Stability Program (ESP)
• Hill Hold & Hill Descent Control
• 5-star Global NCAP safety rating
• Strong active safety focus with tech-led prevention features

Skoda Kylaq vs Mahindra 3XO: Mileage Comparison

Fuel efficiency is still a big factor in this compact SUV showdown for India 2025.

• Kylaq: 19.05–19.68 kmpl (ARAI)
• 3XO: 18.2 kmpl (ARAI, petrol top model)

The Kylaq’s slight edge in mileage could mean fewer fuel stops over years of ownership, though the difference is modest.

Skoda Kylaq or Mahindra 3XO: Which is Better?

Choosing between Skoda Kylaq and Mahindra 3XO comes down to your priorities:

• Choose Kylaq if you want European finesse, slightly higher mileage, better boot space, and a lower price tag.
• Choose 3XO if you want more torque, advanced on-road driver support, and a tech-heavy cabin.

Skoda Kylaq vs Mahindra 3XO: Final Verdict

This isn’t just another Skoda Kylaq vs Mahindra 3XO “face off” comparison. It’s a snapshot of how competitive India’s sub‑4m SUV space has become in recent years.

Whether you favor Skoda’s European charm or Mahindra’s homegrown muscle, you’ll be getting a feature-rich, future-ready SUV.

The real winner is the Indian buyer, who now has more choices than ever in 2025.